Di I am genuinly interested in what you think they should have taken from the site that would have given them a different result. Don't forget that if you were up there well after the investigation any evidence would have been less credible than when the ATSB were up there. If you are referring to the prop hubs I think the supplementary report dealt with that. The prop hubs were the subject of speculation by John Eacott who went up there after the snow melted. He stated on pprune that in his opinion the blades were feathered but the blades had actually separated from the hub so he was basing his opinion on tainted evidence.
CC-At the end of the day we are all just prattling on pprune so why don't you play the ball and not the man.