The point is obviously lost on you
Errr.. No, my point was that you can't use pprune to learn about ATC on a professional basis.
So that there is no doubt, an aircraft flying outbound along the 270 radial is diverging
Err, that's not what you used in your example??
Many providers required the aircraft to be diverging.
The aircraft, or the radials...?? Or does the word "diverging" in the standard somehow sleep? Keep digging that hole.
Separation is established according to an array of issues which can not be established based on a single paragraph from one book.
Now you've really got me intrigued. Doc 4444 is full of paragraphs that can be used for separation. That's, pretty much, what it is.
I'm just going to give DFCs confusing posts a wide berth, and merely re-state that it is highly irresponsible to be seeking guidance on pprune at a professional standard. Punters/pilots/whatever seeking answers out of interest/ad hoc- fine. Alleged
instructors- not on.