Not sure what the above complaints are about. That looks like a fairly well researched and balanced article. Maybe over-stressed the Norsk incident a bit, but generally was fair and accurate.
Sikorski's claim that they "take exception to the characterization that the helicopter failed to meet any FAR 29 requirement" just continues to annoy me.
We have the same debate going on here in the UK at the moment - Whilst it may have fallen within the rules, was it within the 'Spirit of the Rules' ??