partial automation
Just one thing to add to this excellent thread: it seems to me that partial automation, as in the TK case, is more hazardous than the maximal (in that case, FMS-VNAV-LNAV to GS capture then autoland) or minimal (AT off, hand-fly or MCP control). In max. auto, the crew knows that the job is to watch the system very closely. In min. auto, the crew uses its classical training and is fully engaged with the aircraft. Anywhere between, things can get confused more easily. And TK at AMS was in such a mode.
Last edited by Gegenbeispiel; 6th May 2009 at 10:54.