No,
You still don't get it do you?
I am questioning the loyalty or otherwise of people who argue that we should allow some of our junior colleagues to lose their jobs, whilst at the same time hankering after a bit of industrial unrest.
In which case, how could the rest of us possibly trust their commitment to anyone who was subsequently to be fired or otherwise rendered jobless.
They can't have one without the other. It' really that simple!
Do you geddit now?