PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - CAA Prosecution - A lesson to be learnt
View Single Post
Old 24th April 2009 | 22:32
  #72 (permalink)  
BackPacker
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,598
Likes: 0
From: Amsterdam
MP, you should have told the CAA that you were not P1 and quoted the PPRuNe posts last year were quite a lot of the self appointed experts on here were adamant that if you were engaged on a check ride as an instructor with a qualified pilot you could not be P1, funny how none of them have picked up on this!
Need to read the thread a bit more careful next time. I picked upon this in post #5 and the OP responded that he was P1 as per club rules (post #8), and had signed the aircraft out as such (post #1).

In general, on a club mandated club check with a pilot who is otherwise legally current (including the 90-day rule), both the "student" and the "instructor" could legally claim P1, but not simultaneously. So you've got to decide before the flight who is (and gets to log) PIC/P1. At least, that's what I remember from the discussion here a while ago.

In this particular case, the decision seems to have been preempted by club rules. Fair enough. Case closed.
BackPacker is offline  
Reply