Blackmailing again (not unjustifiably, though).
Obviously, there might be a good reason to criticize the Court's decision. The trend of limiting the time-frame of operations at European airports is pretty disturbing. That is even harder to accept when the airport like this one is located SO FAR from the nearest centre of population (any bigger city). BUT, regardless of that, what's the point in
threatening the Court???
Otherwise, the timing is unbelievable, such a hasty enforcement of that ruling. Why breaking thousands of binding contracts between carriers and PAX at so short notice... by the force of law?