It does?
I don't think that legislation consequences formed no part of the decision process. What was bad about what was said? That was the point I was making - the names were mildly mentioned in passing and clearly, the personal and subjective view of the poster anyway.
And what about all those Glenn Torpy name checks then? Is he not allowed the protection of the law? I ask that because if the 'publisher' is to rely on the law, then at least lets have it exercised as a constant. Or if not, lets not have threads removed for silly reasons. The best way to deal with childish trolls is to annoy them with casual and scathing indifference and let them slowly fade away.