When there is a void.....anything that fills it should not be criticized.
DB has done a good thing here....as he has not only defined a problem but has offered up an excellent remedy for it as well.
He has shown a willingness to incorporate changes that enhance the wording and concept.
So....will the CAA slowly creep aboard and embrace his ideas or will they produce yet another expensive study....offer up their version of the changes and then demand Operators comply with their viersion rather than letting the industry arrive at a "best practices" solution?
Worse yet....will they object and undermine the changes as it was NIH?