PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 744 Packs off Take Off
View Single Post
Old 18th April 2009 | 02:33
  #30 (permalink)  
barit1
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
stilton:
On an individual basis, flex / reduced power take off's do not save fuel.

Whilst not the most cost efficient profile when taking into account all other factors a full power take off followed by a max continuous thrust climb to altitude will save the most fuel.
You have stated this quite correctly, given your condition of min fuel for max range. I believe this is true for most turbofan aircraft.

Just don't overlook the " taking into account all other factors " for more mundane ops. Those "all other factors" are far from trivial.
barit1 is offline  
Reply