Ok, so the way I see it there are three main possibilities
when CX announces its "Mandatory Unpaid Leave" (MUPL) scheme tomorrow and the AOA subsequently refuses to endorse it:
1. Company backs down and doesn't impose MUPL.
2. Company unilaterally imposes MUPL with assurances/guarantees of recompense by X time or X economic recovery criteria which AoA grudgingly accepts, or...
3. Company unilaterally imposes MUPL and a very ugly Labour Tribunal/49er style flare up ensues.
Comments from the supercoach(es)??
