Vertico
Over many posts, I believe that I have pointed out sufficient parameters in what is known that indicate a possible intention to land at or approach closely a known LZ on the Mull – you as experienced pilots should have at least recognised their potential relevence. If known settings and procedures are recognised by experienced pilots as being consistent with a particular activity, then such parameters are evidence of that activity.
I believe that the strategy of saying that nothing can be proven has wasted many years.
I believe that if the interested parties could identify and argue with reason and experience any extra activity that the crew was engaged in that has not been declared by the authorities then the verdict would be blown away.