Enderby-Browne:
Why the snippy use of "instant experts"? I was just applying logic and experience to the reported information. I may be wrong - I'd be the first to admit it if good evidence to the contrary emerges - but CFIT does seem to be most likely. And I doubt if anyone on this forum would seriously suggest that a Pprune posting implied that an AAIB investigation was redundant. That would be very silly, wouldn't it? But every time that a Ppruner dares to post a theory or suggestion for the cause of an accident before any report is published, there is some Angry of Tunbridge Wells bursting to flay the hide from our body. Calm down, it's only a Forum.