According to the papers, the guy plead 'guilty'. If he hadn't had a drink or thought he was well below the limit, then he would surely have plead 'not guilty'? The blood test would have showed any other non-normal substances so what are you all getting upset about?
Guilty as charged.
Lose job, go to jail.
He was drunk and he turned up to fly an aeroplane.
End of story.
Defend that? Waste of time.
I reckon steve has it about right.
Last edited by rubik101; 14th Apr 2009 at 06:23.
Reason: spelin