What I find interesting about the current incarnation of the procedure is: why the change?
(That is, why is the wording now "may require an a/c to enter the circuit...")
This has obviously created some uncertainty.
Is it yet another example of the adoption of ICAO standards dumbing us all down, or a genuine attempt to remove the cumbersome ATIS requirement (yay), perhaps as a result of recommendations made concerning that 777 that failed to notice the reduced rwy length at AA a while back?