I simply wish to understand, on whose evidence the crew were guilty of negligence at waypoint change? That's all
Only one witness had a useful perspective of that point in space. That being Holbrook, who has stated that the weather was relatively clear below the cloud which presumably is what enveloped all other witnesses?
In his statement to the Board Mr Holbrook said that the aircraft was well below cloud level and visibility was about a mile limited by haze
These were the facts at the time of the BOI.