I am with Baileys on this one.
If you read my previous posts, you should realise that I am not digging - I don't want to see your negotiations come to naught. Hence, I don't need to know about the outcome. As I said before, it's an issue between you and your employer and, if it's eventually made public, then that's well and good.
I also repeat that the level of restraint on the part of your reps and the members themselves has been commendable. However, the 24th March comment by Baileys has some resonance. For those of us not in the know, who have also refused to swallow the argument that it was 'covert industrial action' solely aimed at CA negotiations, we're a bit puzzled.
The current situation, whereby there have not been any closures/service reductions since 24th March tends to reinforce the attestation by the spin-doctors that it was just a few 'renegades'.
I still don't believe it, but the public might. And I won't mention McGauran.