That's a good and some might say justifiable rant
gasax ...
So, what are you doing about it? Have you written to the CAA?
RTN11, the omission of the VOR rose at SAM was deliberate. I understand there was a school of thought that it was being mistaken for the EGHI Zone boundary. Personally, I think it simply introduces more ambiguity in a different area as well as being inconvenient and glaringly inconsistent - but that's just my opinion.
For anyone wishing to take up any of these matters with the CAA, or indeed offer future chart corrections or additions, an appropriate contact is
[email protected] as mentioned on
this page. From personal experience, I know they will be delighted to receive constructive
feedback on their efforts.
JD