Clarification, Fact or Speculation/Hearsay
Fact 1 Someone has died RIP.
Fact 2 An aircraft was seen following/observing a hunt
Fact 3 Access to an airfield is for authorised users only
Speculation; The pilot broke Rule 5/flew below 500ft
The pilot attempted to injure someone
Hearsay; The pilot was harassing the hunt (subjective opinion)
This country does have a policy of "innocent until proven guilty"
and trial by a jury.
Surely it is now up to the legal system to arrive at the correct conclusion?
IMHO it is not right or prudent for people to attempt to propagate opinions through anonymous forums.
IMHO the hunting debate is very emotive and involvement with it risks muddying the waters and hiding the facts of the case.
It is very easy for Pro or Anti hunt supporters to blow off steam and make accusations, speculations and suppositions on here but in all reality when all the opinions and emotions are put to one side what remains are the facts, and that is what judgements should and will be made on and that should be all that matters!!!
Chester
