I guess if you have lived in cloud cuckooland for the last 15 years the Red Barron would scare you to death into voting yes!
I voted NO and I still await the memorandum, or was that a LIE?
The problem that I have is that I did not believe the pension hype by management last year, so I damned well will not believe anything else that appears from NATSNet or the lips of the Red Man's lips!
I know NSL is in MELTDOWN, but that is a senior management issue. There is the sword, now go and do the sensible thing LH!
I do not trust Prospect either whom I personally believe fell under the Barron's pension deficit spell!
Lawrence and Paul are best buddies, just remember that folks!
And to the YES voters, don't moan when more of your T's & C's are eliminated!
I will forgo a pay rise if NATS pays NIL dividend.
Strange how within CTCland, folk with numerous years of service are being accepted for voluntary redundancy, whilst those with fewer years are not? Could I be wrong in suspecting that NATS wants the huge pay offs to reduce its underline profit for 80-09?
Staff are walking with 2-3 years salary, when others that applied with 2-3 year service are being declined.
If those that are walking are being subsidised by early retirement via our pension scheme, those that vote YES need medical assistance! Can our scheme cope with this additional cost?