PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NATS ageism ruling
View Single Post
Old 28th Feb 2009, 09:29
  #32 (permalink)  
1985
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: southampton
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what should it be and how do you overcome the "why does one extra year make a difference" question ?
I don't know, thats for some bean counter somewhere to decide at what point training someone to become an ATCO becomes too costly for the amount of work you will eventually get out of them. It could be 40 or it could be 50 depending on if NATS thinks it is cost effective.
1985 is offline