Why are you so entrenched in your viewpoint on this subject? why can't you see the plain logic of what I am suggesting?
I think because the plain logic you are trying to put over is not quite so plain. Everyone has agreed that in exceptional circumstances it may be possible however the vast majority of the time it will end on disaster. The evidence out there supports this. The view of the regulator supports this. When we first become Instructors it is a subject done to death and so the training we are given and then give supports this.
Not all readers of this forum are students in fact many are competent pilots. Dare I suggest that you seem to hold a very rigid and illogical position on this.
You are quite correct many of them are. I would consider myself a pretty competent pilot, however I would think twice about a turn back. I only have to look at the endless line of people who turn up for the two year instructional flight and mess up the EFATO drills, and the PFL's to realise that 99.9% of people will kill themselves in a low level turn back attempt.
Therefore as professional pilots and Instructors we have a duty of care to try and make people understand that it is an unwise manoeuvre and the likelihood of disaster is extremely high.
It is fine for the armchair experts to pontificate on how it may be done and how they have done it after stetting up at 3000ft and practiced. It is a VERY different situation when it happens for real, low level and everything suddenly goes quiet. The shock time alone eats up time and height.
Rest assured I will get my point over to you eventually
You have got your point over perfectly. Now listen when those who do this for a living tell you why it is an unwise manoeuvre.