PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Bigger Engines for Longer Range?
View Single Post
Old 5th Feb 2009, 22:48
  #1 (permalink)  
grumpyoldgeek
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: No. Cal, USA
Age: 72
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bigger Engines for Longer Range?

This was posted over in the BA038 thread:

"In 1998 Boeing proposed new longer range variants of the 777X; taking advantage of the Trent 800's growth capability, Rolls-Royce designed and built an improved engine designated Trent 8104 which was later scaled upwards to the even larger 8115. This development was the first engine to break through 100,000 lbf (440 kN) thrust and subsequently the the first to reach 110,000 lbf (490 kN). However, Boeing required that the participating engine developer assume a risk-sharing role on the overall 777X project. Rolls-Royce was unwilling to do so, and in July 1999 Boeing announced that it had chosen the development of the GE90, the GE90-110B and GE90-115B to be the sole engines on the long-range 777s. This resulted in the 8104 becoming just a demonstrator programme, despite setting further industry firsts for thrust levels achieved and the first to demonstrate the use of a fully swept wide chord fan."

I'm trying to understand why you need a bigger engine for longer range. I could understand a more fuel-efficient engine, but not a bigger one. How does that work?
grumpyoldgeek is offline