@lomapaseo
We don't deal in conspiracy theories here and vague references to validate them. I you can't be bothered to read the thread and the facts therein, then you offer zilch to the discussion.
If you want to join the discussion with counters to reported facts by bringing in new analysis in a point by point rebuttal then place your cards face up on the table.
Sorry, did I stumble into the Professional Pilots FACT Network? I thought I was on the rumour network, my bad.
Anyway, here is a link to more information that I've now been able to find:
US Airways Hudson river plane had CFM56-5B engines FAA requested inspection for compression stall problem | DWS Aviation
"It has been revealed that the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had ordered stringent inspection of the type of engines on the US Airways plane that splash-landed in New York’s Hudson River after a few of those engines were found to have a rare kind of stall problem known as “compression stall.”
And later:
""CNN says that, on January 13, 2009, two days before US Airways Flight 1549 landed in the Hudson River, the same plane – also named Flight 1549 and taking off from New York’s LaGuardia Airport to Charlotte, North Carolina, the United States – had encountered problems. Four passengers on that flight on January 13 had said that the crew told the passengers on the intercom that the plane was experiencing “compression stalls.”
Meanwhile, the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) confirmed that there was an entry in the maintenance log of the plane that landed in the Hudson River that a compressor stall had occurred on January 13, 2009."
Can I come out to play now or do I have to finish my dinner first? Sad.