Money would have been better spent re-iterating what was common sense (FIS, RIS, RAS)
But thats the whole point. By just re-iterating the current definitions, the pilots would not take any notice. By changing the definitions and spelling out clearly the responsibilities of the pilots outside controlled airspace to keep a very good look out due to the unknown nature of the beast, it is supposed to encourage awareness.
On how many forums and how many magazines has this new change be debated over the past few months?
Ask a group of random pilots what they believe they are getting under the current procedures (FIS, RIS RAS etc). I bet there are many misunderstandings.
When you go into the new phraseology and the new definitions, it is very much used to enforce the pilots responsibilities as well as the controllers/FISO etc.
Will it work?
IF flying schools/clubs, individuals, airlines etc. etc. make sure they promote awareness in the new service and encourage training, and controllers (who are required to complete an approved UTP) ensure they do not blur the boundaries ie FRIS then it should be an improvement........It will be an interesting few months following March.
