JT,
Sorry if I'm being a bit agressive (or pedantic). All I'm really saying is that if we all try to be a bit more clear, the wider readership will benefit. If the (currently) passive readers feel they can understand what is being said, they are more likley to take part and benefit from the process.
Alex,
Your first post stated that the L1011 V2 increased with increasing density altitude. This did indeed appear to be strange. You then amended this in your second post. I interpreted this amendment as meaning that V2 decreased with increasing altitude, so I commented that this is what the CAP illustrates. Your most recent post is the first time you have mentioned a red line at 1.25 VMCA. I can only suggest that this might (and I stress might) be an extra little safety margin to avoid deep stall.
Last edited by Keith.Williams.; 15th April 2002 at 06:15.