PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Engineering design Vs Pilots perception
View Single Post
Old 11th January 2009 | 19:51
  #29 (permalink)  
Nigd3
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Maybe someone who has flown a "Highways in the sky" type of EVS can give an opinion on how intuitive they are to fly.
I believe it uses a similar principle to the Russian O-I ADI, in that the horizon is fixed and the aircraft symbol moves in relation to it?

Double Zero, you might just want to retract what you said previously about RL
Our latest cockpit doesnt have any traditional (electro-mechanical) standby instruments. The SFD is backed up by an independent battery, for a main battery and generator failure, that also powers independent sensors for air data and attitude, as obviously required by regulations. In the case of a "simple" PFD failure, the NAV is also connected to it, hence the SFD can display QDM, QDR, GS, LOC and DME. Give me that over an E2B and mechanical ADI and Alt any day.

JR - please don't feel you are hijacking the thread. The HF side of cockpit designs are exactly what I would like information on.

Last edited by Nigd3; 11th January 2009 at 20:09.
Nigd3 is offline  
Reply