I'm going to break with tradition and suggest that those who are in a position to do so draw a line in the sand, acknowledge that another re-org is counter-productive, and instead look to better utilise available assets without the superficial attraction of renaming everything.
Are these people not busy enough FFS?
Even better, how about the ProjO for anything that 'requires' renaming goes to see his 1-star, and if the rename/re-org sounds like a load of old bolleaux, said ProjO is demoted. I suspect this might be an antidote for superficial nonsense...
Last edited by dallas; 12th Dec 2008 at 22:19.