797
clearly stated he had absolutely no connection what so ever to ptc, and a statement he made here saying he was directly involved with the training. He is responsible for his own words, i dont know him, or what he does and i dont give a flying **** either. I didnt "damage the credibility of the defence witness", he did that himself.
The fact that you don't understand how, or why, doesn't change the fact that all the above *IS* correct. I have nothing to do with either PTC(FL) or PTC Waterford. I *am*, however, involved in their training and standards in Florida. No lies, no damage to credibility.
What *might* have damaged credibility, certainly as far as this thread goes, was the use of an attempted line of humour - which works in verbal conversation, but clearly not when used in this text (with no emotion in the voice). I had no intention of suggesting *YOU* were/are "stupid".
Let me finish my growls - I have no comment on PTC Waterford as a company (know nothing about them), I have no connection with PTC(FL), I *am* involved in their training - they may be a crap COMPANY - dunno.
What I do know is that PTC left FSI because the standard taught by the FAA instructors at FSI were NOT the standard required by PTC(FL) or the IAA (with regard to the CPL check rides). That bit is NOT open to question.