PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - NATS Pensions (Split from Pay 2009 thread)
Old 2nd December 2008 | 12:35
  #1714 (permalink)  
ProM
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: UK
Not sure what barron is referring to all the people directly involved in any contract that is lost, he can pass on to the winner under the TUPE regulations so he wouldn't have to pay redundancy

I guess there might be a few central admin jobs that he would have to cut but which he cannot justify are directly involved in the particular contract. Not much though

This also means ATCOs need not fear such redundancy (unless the new contract owner believes it needs fewer ATCOs which sounds unlikely)
ProM is offline  
Reply