However are some on here saying that if the vote goes against their opinion and the way they personally voted, rather than accept due process they'll throw their toys out of their pram in further protest?
You are getting confused Roffa.
Lets take the case of someone who wants to vote no as an example.
The majority of people vote 'yes' - the changes come in.
The person in question has to accept the vote - they cannot strike, they cannot take any industrial action whatsoever.
They
can give up extra validations, stop doing AAVA's/overtime, stop doing extra curricular activities (meetings etc).
That is not industrial action per se. It is not 'throwing their toys out of the pram'. It is that person saying that they will no longer assist a company that has drastically reduced their potential pension (deferred pay), by doing things for nothing.
All the activities I have listed above are done on 'goodwill', even to an extent AAVA's which are actually, if you are on or near top of the scale, not even time and a half.
They save the company money. How much do you think the company saves by having people do AAVA's and extra sectors? I can bet you it is several million pounds per year.
This is a dog eat dog world nowadays, why should anyone give precious spare time to a company for nothing??
Working to the letter of your contract is not 'throwing your toys out of the pram'.
Expecting financial reward for doing work over and above your contract
is not 'throwing your toys out of the pram'.
It's not rocket science!
