PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Digital Photography Thread
View Single Post
Old 29th November 2008 | 19:02
  #6 (permalink)  
Loose rivets
Psychophysiological entity
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
: ATPL
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 169
From: Walton on the Naze Essex.
To answer the question, I have to say I can't, cos don't know.

The names seem to be interchangeable, but I'd always thought that the Nikkor might be a slightly cheaper version. However, folk with lenses marked thus, do not seem to think they've gone down market.


I got a D50. The 6mp has never been an issue, and the money I saved getting a 'Refurbished' (obviously untouched) meant that I could put the 15-55 lens to one side, and get a good lens (off Craigslist) for the difference. my 18-70 really is a serious piece of kit. Good light-gathering with its 67mm glass at $240 used.

The higher pixel count is tempting, and I've looked at higher end cameras to get the detail. But the fact is that it just isn't worth having a lesser quality camera just to get more pixels. Wanting to print out to very large photos might change all this, but I do put the pics on a 50" hi def, and never have I been troubled by pixelation.
Loose rivets is offline  
Reply