PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - An affordable twin???
View Single Post
Old 27th November 2008 | 12:30
  #11 (permalink)  
englishal

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
From: 75N 16E
normally aspirated twins would struggle to hold 4,000' AMSL on one engine, probably more like 3,500; which is less than the MSA over just the hills of the UK. Add turbocharging and you're probably well to the right of relatively 'affordable' compared to a decent high performance single, even then don't expect much above 8,000'.
Should read "most knackered old training type twins..." I agree the BE76 or Seminole have pretty crap SE performance.

I'd rather fly a decent twin any day though. With a SE if the engine fails you have one option, go down. Most light twins I've flown can fly quite happily on one engine, even when moderately loaded. Turbo's make a great difference though and even the likes of a Twin Star with 3 POB and overnight baggage and lots of fuel (probably at Max UUW) will happily climb on one engine to a good altitude.
englishal is offline  
Reply