Yes, I have, quite a few times. Thanks for the info but some of us here do that sort of thing for a living.
That's why I was somewhat surprised by your previous response. Am I misreading it, or do you regard the 'captured in the wash' explanation as untenable? If so I would welcome any indication as to why.
(This is a test, isn't it)?
No, but I do regard it as a puzzle. I get the feeling that I am oblivious to something glaringly obvious to everyone else, if so, would someone please put me out of my misery!
The Airprox board rejected a rogue microlight and an r/c model aircraft as the explanation (for perfectly valid reasons), I don't understand why they didn't consider the 'captured in the wash' scenario. Am I missing something, or does anyone have any other suggestions for a solution (other than little green men in tiny spaceships chasing police helicopters)?
Cheers,
Joe