eglnyt
Vote NO
I tend to agree with your earlier post that the discussion has run its course but I will ask two questions about the output from the modeller because only you know what your figures say.
First what % above RPI did you use to get 8K ? Second how does the figure you get compare with 27K pension which is the best you'll get if the worst happens and NATS goes under and the fund has to refer to the Pension Protection Fund
0.55% = 0.5K loss
0.625% = 1K loss
0.75% = 2K loss
1% = 4K loss
1.5% = 8K loss
2.5% (LAST 10 year ave.)
16k loss
If NATS goes under,here we go again
HMG who own 49% will take over the rest and the Pension, otherwise
we will go on strike! Remember
NATS is crucial to the infrastrucure of UK security,safety,economy.
NATS must continue to operate at full efficiency. The country would collapse with no aviation, no food, no tourism, no business!
I think any level headed individual would agree NATS can not "go under" if the private side fails, why do you think HMG has the major stake? Here we go again
UK SAFETY, ECONOMY, SECURITY.
That is why HMG retain the major share
I also, await, as ever, a convoluted and overly verbose reply from your good self explaining the error of my ways.
yours sincerely
Vote No