I'm saying exactly what I wrote. If I think you are wrong I will correct you. If it is arrogant for somebody with access to the correct facts to question incorrect ones or arrogant to suggest an alternative point of view possible with the same evidence then I admit to arrogance
Then you need to re-phrase it because grammatically, what you are saying is twofold... you
think they are wrong (infers they might not be), but you will correct them (even though you
only think they might be wrong.
Whatever, the way you have written it implies arrogance and a belief that you know better, whether you do or not. The same arrogant attitude that keeps telling people to attend a brief etc just because they see the statistics differently from you.
As for
...access to the correct facts...
where is the provenance in that statement, apart from merely taking your word for it? Or are you happy for people to believe you at your word, but not anyone else?
You might not be arrogant at all, but that is how you come across to me - I doubt I'm alone.