Just to clarify, as the HR woman was too busy to answer my question, I asked the Union guys whether this could be pushed through regardless, in the event of a majority NO vote. He said that certain parts of it COULD be imposed regardless but, importantly, the cap element could not be. So, we vote NO, the worst Barron can do is implement a SMART pension scheme with no cap. Oh, and the Union guys also confirmed that he DOES drive a DB9 (contrary to his NATSnet rebuttal) and apparently never shuts up about it...their words not mine!
