I think it is really just a question of good judgement based on experience of life in general.
The softening up process is the Briefing, followed by the "Barstool session". And with the Union on board spouting management cliches
then surely we must beleive them! They couldn't possibly be economical with the truth, could they?
Ask yourself, who stands to gain from this financially?
Answer= Management
Who stands to lose from this financially?
Answer= Staff
Are you really willing to tie your pensionable earnings into a
15 year deal capped at
RPI+ 0.5% ?
Stick
RPI +2.5% into the model to represent the last ten years average pay increase for ATCOS. Also try RPI+2% for non ATCO staff. Fifteen years is a long time to have a pension cap.
That's why I will still Vote NO