PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - ". . . wood for the trees"
View Single Post
Old 10th November 2008 | 10:10
  #7 (permalink)  
Islander2
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: An island somewhere
In practice it should have BRNAV, but it is in principle "airways" without. "IFR" is much more vague -- could be anything.
Like me, do you you find that curious, bookworm? It seems very clear that the CAA means B-RNAV to be 'airways' mandatory above FL095, the AIP section equivalent to Schedule 5 includes it (paragraph 5.2.5, GEN 1.5), yet Schedule 5 doesn't! Is it just an oversight in recent ANO amendments?
Islander2 is offline  
Reply