Jetski
Easily solved and brings peace to all on here - try not popping up for a month about AOPA matters, their directors, etc.
If AOPA can leave this place free of AOPA business, what's so hard for a non-member to follow suit? This thread is about the JCP but it seems certain people need to drag everything to involving an organisation to which they don't even belong and which has indicated it isn't going to debate on here. Get a life
(PS your 'email register' - aren't proxy IPs and proxy posters wonderful things).
Your last post does nothing to enrich the thread topic
It does because it suggests you proceed as above, plus the topic of WX by satellite is quite enriching to the topic.
The USA is looking to UAT to:
1. Solve 1090 congestion at several critical points,
2. Keep AOPA USA (stress "USA") happy about no subsidy therefore some carrot in return = WX and TFC via UAT.
Unsurprisingly, the WX by satellite people have decided to ramp up the competition, therefore raising questions about the value of WX by UAT.
And, the FAA since 2005 has been winding back on TIS.
So, all should be interested in the implications of the Avidyne demo. If Avidyne can provide WX by satellite for Oz ........
Here's the flyer
http://i459.photobucket.com/albums/q.../AVIDYNEWX.jpg