I did not mean to upset anyone. I am not just interested in the bells and whistles-quite the contrary. The main argument I have heard against the 332 and/or 225 is the cabin height. My only point was that myself and quite a few other crewman have the knee and backs to show years of ship service and SAR even in the good old 61.
From what I see on these forums there are problems with the 139's, 92's and even the ageing Sea Kings. The discussions mostly go around these types and their problems as well as the aircraft reliability, cost and maintainability and then of course it's operational capability impacting on this tender. I have actually just been wondering, as posted, why the 225 is not mentioned because the forums are rather quiet about it's performance/problems etc.