That's correct DE, cos as we all know big finance company takeovers are unlikely to insist on any changes to their newly acquired company!
They are bound to invest heavily in improving existing contracts by injecting cash into them to improve working conditions even though the contracts already deliver with the bare minimums of pay and conditions and they are unlikely to make swingeing cost cutting moves to ensure a return on their acquisition. I think it is highly unlikely that smaller existing contracts that don't yield the correct return will be axed.............
Isn't the motivation for management buy out finance companies to acquire, improve and sell on with min cost and min turnaround time?
