idiots guide to pensions question 3,294:
erm... if NATS have been paying below the underlying rate, how come theysay we are 100% (or near as dammit) funded at the moment.? If future commitments cant be met, then how can the fund be at 100% funding or indeed 112% funded (in surplus) as it was recently etc. Is this one of those lies, damed lies and statistics situations?
