I have been reading all these threads and NATSnet with rising fury regarding this sorry pension debate. I want to know why the NTUS reps agreed to the secrecy clause to protect the "credible" Deloitte and Touche report?? This is OUR pension and we are entitled to see the evidence that has caused such a stir and convinced the NTUS reps that change is required. The secrecy clause was soley to protect Deloitte from come back if they got it wrong, again.
We are mature and intelligent people with a very big vested interest in this report. If the report was soooo convincing we should have been able to view it for ourselves and make our own minds up!!.......oh no, the NTUS reps know better, don't they. AGAINST Prospect current branch policy, they entered into negotiations with management and have struck up this deal to be recommended to the staff. WHAT RIGHT do they have???
As far as the memorandum of understanding is concerned this document has NOT been written yet, but is nothing more that a promised wish list from that snake Barron and his nest of vipers. The gulable NTUS reps are hoping that we will TRUST them and vote yes! YOU MUST BE JOKING!!!
I never trust NATS management, but the sorryest thing for me is that I don't trust the Prosect BEC either. What bribes have been promised to the negotiating team in return for a yes vote???
Vote NO to the offer, then vote NO CONFIDENCE in the BEC!!!
Last edited by delta20; 21st October 2008 at 09:35.