PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Cessna 310R
Thread: Cessna 310R
View Single Post
Old 19th October 2008 | 17:31
  #13 (permalink)  
UL730

Cut & Paste Intellectual
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
: PPL
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Durham
Did my training and initial IRT in a 310R and found it a very stable instrument platform.

Known ice is helpful but this is a contentious area for any light twin.

Mention of training with a pilot with really good experience on this type is particularly sound advice. http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/cms_resou...SH%2001-96.pdf

Short field or any “field” is not the natural hunting ground for 310R: – IMHO the Aztec is better.

The 310R with IO-520-MB engines is a greyhound and a serious travelling machine with good single engine performance if required and the operator is profficient.

You will inevitably become well acquanted with our friends in EuroControl or NATS route charging if you tire of the European approach.

Watch out for a major 6500-hour wing inspection that can be costly

You might find this link helpful if comparing with the Baron but normal caveats apply on perceived preferences.

Flight test - Cessna 310R vs Beech Baron 58
UL730 is offline  
Reply