So a "minority of staff" are involved in industrial action by refusing to work on their days off......causing major disruptions.
What would happen if a majority of staff engaged in industrial action, and decided not to work on THEIR DAYS OFF?
What would happen if the majority of staff engaged in real industrial action, and not just the excuse-for-not-being-able-to-balance-making-my-bonus-as-well-as-keeping-the-shop-open lies? I guess the CEO could blame-shift with a straight face. Maybe thats (cue sinister music) the plan?
I think August 135, 2008 might go down in history as a watershed in industrial relations at AsA.
I'd have to think about it, but if I was on 100k or so per month, I might do/say absolutely anything to squeak out another month or two. When government owned "businesses" are setting up tax shelters in foreign countries in order to exploit 'loopholes', anything is possible (ethically speaking).