The problem Dick & Lefty is that what you are proposing sounds great in principle ... but like all good ideas, the problems start appearing in the detail.
That is why we have Safety Cases, Cost Benefit Analyses and Technical Specs etc etc etc when a new idea is proposed.
Some of us believe we can see some of the potential issues in implementing your idea ( eg. at least one extra radio communication and at least one extra Controller input would be required for EVERY instrument approach to an uncontrolled aerodrome). You don't see those problems as relevant. Perhaps you are right and we are wrong.
I would suggest that the only way your idea has a chance of being implemented is if you (or someone you can persuade) puts, at least, a decent business proposal and safety case together and submitts them to ASA for consideration.
As has been said before, throwing it at us isn't going to get it done, and I think ASA has enough on its plate at the moment, so I can't see them initiating it.