PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Spanair accident at Madrid
View Single Post
Old 19th Sep 2008, 15:52
  #1862 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HarryMann;
Now, back to why this wrong configuration was used at take-off....
Absolutely. The diagrams and explanations are sufficient for understanding by most, so back to "why?"

sevenstrokeroll;
it is simply too hard to communicate with some on this forum...good luck to you all.
Yes, it is, isn't it? I applaud your efforts none the less. As you see, most professionals who contributed earlier and tried to provide insight for earnest and serious non-professionals, have left. This is a very thorough thread with answers to most questions. All it takes is a little patience and respectful effort.

It's not so much "giving up" as spending one's time in more productive and less redundant endeavours. Your efforts are inspiring and well worth reading but the dialog is essentially over for most. Johnny-come-lately elementary questions which clearly reflect lack of effort and the basic courtesy of reading before writing, have thorough, detailed answers which are in the thread already and unless one has the time and inclination, do not warrant further effort.

LUALBA, in reference to your post to sevenstrokeroll:
You have issued your final report of the accident.

Incredible how someone can affirm at this time so many things without all the information. Maybe you are right, maybe not, but what is extremly clear is that you can NOT AFFIRM AT THIS POINT the reasons why the AC crash.
Regardless of intent, you gain no ground by shouting, (bolding), which is how your post comes across in print. However, it's a free forum and to each his own.

Second, sevenstrokeroll has made comments which, to aviation safety professionals and many airline crews, ring true and which have a long and interesting history within the safety community and which many believe apply to this accident. The comments made are nowhere near a "report", but are familiar observations which should, but likely won't, form part of the investigative work and formal report, in this accident. You are right that we cannot affirm without all doubt removed, that these factors played a role in this accident, but that was not the intent - rather, they are "sign-posts" which point to the way this accident will likely have unfolded.
PJ2 is offline