Jester,
I think thats a better topic here in Clark Av forum. Is MPL a better way of training airline pilots or should we still settle for traditional?
all i can say is that, students and instructors (seasoned ones.. those who have instructed in PAL and Cebupac pilots), that the MCC phase, 27sessions of A320 level D, are more that enough training.
According to them, in traditional training, those who want to have CPL license just fly, in tagalog "naguubos oras", unlike in the advance phase of MPL, every hour and every session has a lesson. You are learning every hour.
Thats according to them. Convinced that this is the better way of training airline pilots.
But then again, i guess it is really hard to change what is traditional and have proven results. MPL graduates has to prove themselves to the world still.
My say is, Clark Av has a lot of things to fix, standards to achieve, but I believe that this is a good means to have airline pilots.
your say?