very valid point bushy and in many ways it is at the foundation of many of the issues raised in some of the submissions
Whether in RPT or GA we don't need CASA to be a nanny or even a friendly partner - we just want and expect precise and consistent standards as well as a not-negotiable stance on compromising the regulatory environment.
Sadly the swag of illogical precedents, dispensations and commercially driven exemptions, - (especially some of the pollie induced concessions to overseas operators), means that Australia's "multiple choice" aviation puzzle will still be missing a few important pieces.
Knowing the way these documents are "collectively proof read" before tabling in Parliament, I doubt there will be little significant change except maybe for the appointment of a token 'review/governance board' and the revival of an 'industry consultative committee'.
AT